{"product_id":"medical-history-and-physical-examination-in-companion-animals-9780792330370","title":"Medical History and Physical Examination in Companion Animals","description":"\u003cp\u003e • Author(s): A. Rijnberk\u003cbr\u003e • Publisher: Springer\u003cbr\u003e • Publisher Imprint: Springer\u003cbr\u003e • BISAC: General\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ecreation no falsification falsification Tl rejected creation etc. Figure 1-1 delivers such a result that the theory must be seen as an extension of Popper's rational proce- discarded. In this way we come at the same time dure for theory elimination. to the border between science and nonscience: a Popper's naive falsifiability knows only one theory is scientific if it is falsifiable. It is thus way, the elimination of what is weak. The so- not scientific to bring additional evidence to phisticated falsifiability, in contrast, knows only bear in vindication of the theory; the theory elimination in combination with the acceptance would thereby take on the character of an un- of an alternative. According to sophisticated fal- challengeable certainty of belief ('religion'). sifiability, a scientific theory T r is only aban- Following Popper, others such as Kuhn, with doned if its place is taken by another theory T2 his paradigm theory, have considerably extended which has the following three characteristics: 1 the range of thought over what is scientific and T 2 has more empirical content than TI; the new what is not.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Springer","offers":[{"title":"Hardcover","offer_id":45284253696151,"sku":"9780792330370","price":14690.0,"currency_code":"INR","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0666\/3471\/1191\/files\/9780792330370.webp?v=1769280631","url":"https:\/\/atlanticbooks.com\/products\/medical-history-and-physical-examination-in-companion-animals-9780792330370","provider":"Atlantic Books","version":"1.0","type":"link"}