Skip to content

Booksellers & Trade Customers: Sign up for online bulk buying at trade.atlanticbooks.com for wholesale discounts

Booksellers: Create Account on our B2B Portal for wholesale discounts

Must Beliefs and Evidence Agree?: A Debate

by Scott Stapleford , Elizabeth Jackson
Save 35% Save 35%
Current price ₹3,562.00
Original price ₹5,480.00
Original price ₹5,480.00
Original price ₹5,480.00
(-35%)
₹3,562.00
Current price ₹3,562.00

Imported Edition - Ships in 12-14 Days

Free Shipping in India on orders above Rs. 500

Request Bulk Quantity Quote
+91
Book cover type: Paperback
  • ISBN13: 9780367468248
  • Binding: Paperback
  • Subject: N/A
  • Publisher: Routledge
  • Publisher Imprint: Routledge
  • Publication Date:
  • Pages: 222
  • Original Price: GBP 41.99
  • Language: English
  • Edition: 1
  • Item Weight: 282 grams
  • BISAC Subject(s): General

Should our beliefs be proportioned to our evidence? Are we doing something wrong in believing with little or no evidence? And may our beliefs be based partly or wholly on moral or practical considerations? These questions are harder than you think. Scott Stapleford and Elizabeth Jackson agree on the priority of evidence, but they differ on the degree of permissible slack and the relevance of other considerations.

In this lively epistemological debate, Stapleford takes a hard line, defending the extremist view that any discrepancy between what we believe and what our evidence supports is an error that should be corrected. In the economy of our beliefs, evidence alone has a normative grip. Jackson is more forgiving. While evidence regulates belief, its authority is not complete. She takes a more liberal perspective that accords non-evidential factors a lawful role in delimiting the class of permissible beliefs.

With echoes of the famous 19th century dispute between the mathematician William Clifford and the psychologist William James, the Stapleford-Jackson debate feels particularly relevant in a time when disagreement runs uncomfortably hot and evidence is treated with contempt. This debate will tempt--and gently instruct--anyone who has ever asked themselves: Can't I just believe what I want?

Key Features

  • Includes accessible discussions of evidence, evidentialism, transparency, epistemic value monism, the aim of belief, permissivism, encroachment, practical reasons for belief, epistemic obligations, Pascal's wager, and much more.
  • Is highly readable, with clear language and an easy-to-follow format.
  • Includes boxed summaries at the end of each section and partitioned expansions of key ideas that supplement the main lines of reasoning.

Scott Stapleford is Professor of Philosophy at St. Thomas University in Fredericton, Canada. His recent publications include: Logic Works: A Rigorous Introduction to Formal Logic (with Lorne Falkenstein and Molly Kao, 2022), Hume's Enquiry: Expanded and Explained (with Tyron Goldschmidt, 2021), and six edited collections.

Elizabeth Jackson is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Saint Louis University, and her research is in epistemology and philosophy of religion. She's published in journals such as Mind, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, and Philosophical Studies.

Trusted for over 49 years

Family Owned Company

Secure Payment

All Major Credit Cards/Debit Cards/UPI & More Accepted

New & Authentic Products

India's Largest Distributor

Need Support?

Whatsapp Us